
The concept of indifference curve analysis is based on the law of diminishing marginal rate of substitution. It states, with more consumption of one commodity, the marginal rate of substitution declines.
As indifference curve explains that when a customer gets one more unit of a commodity, he has to sacrifice some units of another commodity to retain at the same level of satisfaction. In other words, in exchange for the satisfaction obtained from an additional unit of commodity-1, the consumer has to give up that many units of commodity-2 whose satisfaction is equal to additional satisfaction obtained from an additional unit of commodity-1.
Subscribe our Youtube Channel
Utility gained from more unit of commodity-1= Utility lost of commodity-2
Thus, the Marginal Rate of Substitution is the rate at which consumer can substitute one commodity for another without changing the level of satisfaction. It indicates the slope of indifference curves.
In the words of Prof. Bilas,
"The marginal rate of substitution of X for Y is defined as the amount of Y, the consumer is willing to give up to get one more unit of X and maintain the same level of satisfaction."
| MRSXY | = | Loss of Y | = | (-) | ΔY |
| Gain of X | ΔX |
Here,
MRSXY represents the Marginal Rate of Substitution of X for Y
ΔY represents the change in Y
ΔX represents the change in X
In short, the marginal rate of substitution is the ratio of the amount of Y that must be sacrificed per unit of X gained if the consumer is to remain at the same level of satisfaction. Since the effect of change in Y with respect to X is opposite. Therefore, the ratio is negative.
This law states that as a consumer gets more and more unit of a commodity, he will be willing to give up less and fewer units of another commodity so that the level of satisfaction of the consumer remains the same. In other words, the marginal rate of substitution of X for Y will go on diminishing.
According to Ferguson,
"The law of diminishing marginal rate of substitution states that as X is substituted for Y soo as to leave the consumer on the same indifference curve, the marginal rate of substitution of X for Y diminishes."
| Combination of Wheat and Rice | Rice (in units) |
Wheat (in units) |
MRS |
| A | 5 | 10 | |
| B | 6 | 7 | 3:1 |
| C | 7 | 5 | 2:1 |
| D | 8 | 4 | 1:1 |
In the above table, it is clearly shown that the consumer will give up 3 units of wheat for getting an additional unit of rice as the consumption of wheat declines to 7 units from 10 units with an increase in consumption of just one more unit of rice. Similarly, as consumer consumes one more unit of rice, it declines the consumption of wheat from 7 to 5 units, sacrificing 2 units of wheat for one more unit of rice. Likewise, an increase in unit consumption of rice results in the sacrifice of 1 unit of wheat. Thus, the marginal rate of substitution of rice for wheat goes on diminishing.
In fig, X-axis represents the quantity of rice and Y-axis represents the quantity of wheat. The graph, clearly shows that when a consumer moves from A to B, he has to give up 3 units of wheat to obtain one additional unit of rice. Therefore, the consumer's marginal rate of substitution of rice for wheat is said to be 3:1.
When he moves from B to C, he gives up only 2 units of wheat to get an additional unit of rice. Here, the marginal rate of substitution of rice for wheat is 2:1. Thus, it is cleared that as the consumer increases the consumption of rice, then for getting every additional unit of it, he gives up less and fewer units of wheat i.e. 3:1,2:1 and 1:1 respectively. Hence, it is known as the Marginal rate of substitution and the law relating to it is the law of Diminishing Marginal rate of substitution.
Law of Diminishing Marginal Utility and Law of Diminishing Marginal Rate of Substitution:
According to Prof.Hicks, the law of diminishing marginal rate of substitution explains this tendency of consumer behaviour with far fewer assumptions than the law of diminishing marginal utility. Consequently, the law of diminishing marginal rate of substitution is more realistic than the law of diminishing marginal utility due to the following reasons:
Law of diminishing marginal utility is based on the assumption that utility can be measured in cardinal numbers. But, in the law of diminishing marginal rate of substitution, there is no need for measuring the utility. Therefore, this law is more realistic.
The law of diminishing utility is based on the assumption that only one commodity is consumed by the consumer and the utility depends upon the availability of that commodity only. But, in the law of diminishing marginal rate of substitution, there is no need for such an assumption. Whether this law considers the effect of utilities of related goods on each other. Thus, it recognizes the interdependency of commodities on each other.
The law of diminishing marginal utility assumes that the marginal utility of money remains constant, which is unrealistic. On the other hand, the law of diminishing marginal rate of substitution ignores such unrealistic assumption.
Thanks Please share with your friends
Comment if you have any question.
References:
Economics Educator
Mrs. Dilgeerjot Kaur holds a B.Com and M.Com degree and has over 9 years of teaching experience in microeconomics, macroeconomics, and business economics.
This guide covers "Law of Diminishing Marginal Rate of Substitution", focusing on key definitions, step-by-step concepts, applications, and revision guidelines relevant to Economics Class 11.
It is primarily curated for Class 11 and Class 12 high school commerce, accounting, and economics students, as well as aspirants preparing for board exams or CA Foundation.
You can take our custom-built interactive practice quiz directly on this page to test your understanding of "Law of Diminishing Marginal Rate of Substitution" instantly.